
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
    <title>CompuSaff Today!</title>
    <link>http://today.compusaff.com/</link>
    <description>Quick takes on software, tips, and &#039;net oddities</description>
    <language>en-us</language>           
    <generator>Nucleus CMS v3.64</generator>
    <copyright>&#169;</copyright>             
    <category>Weblog</category>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    
    <item>
    <title>2010.06.15 - Change is Coming!</title>
    <link>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1146</link>
    <description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Time to switch to a new CMS package.  This is getting unmanageable:  RSS feeds no longer work, features have fallen behind the times, and I'm making the switch.  How much can I get ported over?  Not sure yet.  Certainly can't retype it all.  But I'm struggling with the import tools available, so I may need to get creative.<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Stay tuned! <sup><font color="#800000"> 14970</font></sup>]]></description>
    <category>General</category>
    <comments>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1146</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:03:59 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
    <title>2010.05.14 - Pidgin Rollup</title>
    <link>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1145</link>
    <description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;If you're a Pidgin instant messenger user, you'll want to upgrade to the latest <a href="http://pidgin.im/" title="2.7.0 Version" target="_blank">2.7.0 Version</a>. There are a whole raft of fixes shown in the <a href="http://developer.pidgin.im/wiki/ChangeLog">ChangeLog</a>, including what looks to be a fix for the mangled / dropped / partial messages when using Yahoo accounts.  Don't forget to re-apply your <a href="http://pidgin-encrypt.sourceforge.net/">Pidgin-Encryption</a> plug-in after you install the upgrade, otherwise your encryption will not work!<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Update - Pidgin Encryption 3.0 will not work with Pidgin 2.7.0, but the new 3.1 version reportedly will.  Watch this space for when the PE3.1 for Windows arrives.<sup><font color="#800000"> 14954</font></sup>]]></description>
    <category>Software</category>
    <comments>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1145</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 00:02:26 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
    <title>2010.04.12 - Impossible? Unbelievable?? Magic!!!</title>
    <link>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1144</link>
    <description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Magic is all about illusion, mis-direction, and deception, right??  So <a href="http://www.flixxy.com/magic-show-liu-qian.htm" target=_blank>watch it twice</a> (like I did!), and then tell me how Liu Qian does it! <sup><font color="#800000"> 14917</font></sup>]]></description>
    <category>TMT</category>
    <comments>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1144</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:05:16 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
    <title>2010.04.02 - Foxit Reader Fixed</title>
    <link>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1143</link>
    <description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Yesterday we passed along InfoWorld's warning about PDF readers that can run an executable without asking your permission.  Today, Foxit Software rolled out their fixed version that corrects this vulnerability.  Get Foxit Reader 3.2.1.0401 <a href="http://fileforum.betanews.com/detail/Foxit-Reader/1102316680/1">from BetaNews</a> and stay safe from rogue PDF docs!<sup><font color="#800000"> 14913</font></sup>]]></description>
    <category>Software</category>
    <comments>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1143</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 2 Apr 2010 22:56:16 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
    <title>2010.04.01 PDF Vulnerability</title>
    <link>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1142</link>
    <description><![CDATA[<div align="center"><em><h1><strong><font color="#FF0000">PDF</font></strong></h1></em></div><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Most folks use Adobe's Acrobat Reader to view PDF documents.  Several of us have ditched Acrobat Reader in favor of faster, more usable utilities such as Foxit's <a href="http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/reader/" target=_blank>Reader 3.0 for Windows</a>.  Beware that a new loophole has been exposed that allows the bad guys to subvert your system just from you opening a specially crafted PDF doc.<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;This Security Central article over at InfoWorld<a href="http://www.infoworld.com/d/security-central/malicious-pdf-file-doesnt-need-software-vulnerability-002?source=rss_infoworld_news" target=_blank>[Malicious PDF file doesn't need a software vulnerability]</a> documents the dirty details and the vendor reponses.  Bottom line?  Be on the lookout for updates to your PDF reader software in the next week or two and <em>then download and install it!</em><sup><font color="#800000"> 14913</font></sup>]]></description>
    <category>Software</category>
    <comments>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1142</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 1 Apr 2010 22:59:27 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
    <title>2010.02.11 - Blue Screened?</title>
    <link>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1141</link>
    <description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Did you end up with the infamous Blue Screen of Death on your Windows XP machine after this week's round of security update patches from Microsoft?  If so, you might want to start here for a resolution:  InfoWorld has chronicled the issue with links to a potential solution at <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/d/security-central/windows-patch-cripples-xp-blue-screen-users-claim-954">Windows patch cripples XP with blue screen</a>. </a><sup><font color="#800000"> 14885</font></sup>]]></description>
    <category>Hints and Tips</category>
    <comments>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1141</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:45:14 -0600</pubDate>
</item><item>
    <title>2010.01.27 - Are We Safe When Browsing?</title>
    <link>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1140</link>
    <description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;So, you know all about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tracking_cookies" target=_blank>tracking cookies</a> from web advertisers, and you've switched to <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/personal.html" target=_blank>Firefox Browser</a> with <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865" target=_blank>Adblock Plus</a> to cut down on the ads, with <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/11073" target=_blank>Targeted Advertising Cookie Opt-Out (TACO)</a> addon, too.  Pretty safe, right?<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;But now you've got Flash <acronym title="Local Shared Objects">LSO's</acronym> leaving trackable scraps on your system.  For that you can use the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6623" target=_blank>BetterPrivacy</a> addon to get those removed every time you close your browser.  <br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Whew!!  Lots to protect from.  But you're safe now, right?  Not so fast, grasshopper!  What if you could be more or less identified just by the uniqueness of your system?  Like your combination of fonts, User Agent from your browser, and the browser plugins you are using.  Stuff like your screen size, and color depth.   Interesting theory, isn't it? <br><br><blockquote><i>When you visit a website, you are allowing that site to access a lot of information about your computer. Combined, this information can create a kind of fingerprint — a signature that could be used to identify you and your computer. But how effective would this kind of online tracking be?</i></blockquote>The <a href="https://www.eff.org/" target=_blank><acronym title="Electronic Frontier Foundation">EFF</acronym></a> is running an experiment on just that possibility right now. From my machine, Panopticlick reports: <br><br><blockquote><i>Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 60,715 tested so far. Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys at least 15.89 bits of identifying information.</i></blockquote>And it doesn't seem to make much difference if I'm using Firefox's Private Browsing mode or not.  Hmmm.....  You can read about the study at their <a href="http://panopticlick.eff.org/" target=_blank>Panopticlick</a> web page.  And, if you so choose, you can check to see how unique your web fingerprint is - or isn't!<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;What kind of results did you get?  Let us know in the comments! </a><sup><font color="#800000"> 14873</font></sup>]]></description>
    <category>General</category>
    <comments>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1140</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:11:48 -0600</pubDate>
</item><item>
    <title>2010.01.25 - Load All Your Apps At Once!</title>
    <link>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1139</link>
    <description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Building that new machine?  Tired of downloading, installing, rebooting, - and starting over for the next one?  Maybe you need one of the super loaders. <br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Start with having a look at <a href="http://ninite.com/" target=_blank>Ninite Easy PC Setup</a>.  Ninite lets you pick from current versions of popular apps across several categories to let you automatically download and install the apps you select.  So pick your favorite Browsers, Instant Messengers, media players, office productivity suites, browser plugins, system utilities, and more.  You can pick any or all the apps you want and then click on the Get Installer button to get your install package.<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Another similar service is available from <a href="http://www.allmyapps.com/windows-xp/" target=_blank>Allmyapps</a>.  Allmyapps bills itself as the <em>"Application Store for Windows XP, Vista and Seven to find and install the best applications"</em>.  This site features an even larger set of apps to choose from.<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Give these a shot and let us know the pros and cons of how they worked for you in the comments.<sup><font color="#800000"> 14871</font></sup>]]></description>
    <category>Software</category>
    <comments>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1139</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:10:07 -0600</pubDate>
</item><item>
    <title>2009.12.18 - Back!</title>
    <link>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1138</link>
    <description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;A week ago (Dec. 10th), my <acronym title="Internet Service Provider">ISP</acronym>, <a href="http://1and1.com" title="1and1" target="_blank">1and1</a> informed us that<br />
<br><br><blockquote><i>Our technical administrators have identified a service issue and are <br />
working to resolve it as quickly as possible. Since your system may be <br />
among those affected, you may experience some disruption in service <br />
for the next 24 hours while we resolve this issue. <br />
</i></blockquote><br />
 The next update (Dec. 12th) was more serious, but sounded like a plan was in place:<br />
<br><br><blockquote><i>On December 10th at 2:00am EST, our technicians discovered a malfunction <br />
in the server that hosts your site.  Currently, your website is still offline.<br />
  <br />
However, we have isolated the malfunction and are working to restore your <br />
service as quickly as possible.  The restoration of your website will be <br />
complete tonight around 10:00pm EST.  You will not experience any loss of data.<br />
<br />
We know that you trust us with one of your most important resources, your <br />
website, and we are truly sorry for the negative impact that this outage has <br />
had on your business or personal web presence.  <br />
<br />
Please be assured that we have done everything within our capacity in handling <br />
this matter. Our technicians understand the priority of this, and have followed <br />
all procedures in place to ensure limited downtime for your site, which is our <br />
primary concern.<br />
<br />
We are investigating any improvements we can make to our processes for the <br />
future to ensure that an incident like this does not develop to a major outage.<br />
<br />
***************************************<br />
Technical Information:<br />
***************************************<br />
The web server that your site is hosted on has been offline due to a hardware <br />
failure in the RAID setup.<br />
<br />
RAID stands for "Redundant Array of Independent Disks" and is a technology <br />
that employs the simultaneous use of two or more hard disk drives to achieve <br />
greater levels of reliability and performance.<br />
<br />
Your website is stored across the RAID system twice over different hard drives, <br />
if one of the hard drives fails your web site will continue to run. The failed <br />
hard drive is replaced and the data that was on the drive copied again from the <br />
other drives within the RAID, this is known as rebuilding the RAID, and normally <br />
happens seamlessly without any effect to the web hosting server or your website. <br />
<br />
This is a daily task performed in our data centers and is standard for large <br />
data storage systems such as used in the web hosting environment.<br />
<br />
In this instance, we replaced the failed drive with a new drive and the RAID <br />
started to rebuild. While this was happening the rebuild process failed, <br />
corrupting all the data within the RAID set. This should not happen and we <br />
have open tickets with the RAID manufacturer to understand what went wrong <br />
in this case and to ensure that they can prevent this for the future.<br />
<br />
Our system administrators do not rely on the RAID system as our only source <br />
of backup. We run a rolling backup of the live system to external backup servers <br />
to ensure that in a case like this we have a restore solution.<br />
<br />
After the RAID corruption occurred, our engineers analyzed the situation and <br />
found that the only solution left to us was to recover the data from our backup <br />
systems. At this point the RAID was reinitialized ready to receive data, this <br />
process itself takes several hours to perform.<br />
</i></blockquote>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Okay, so there would be additional delay, but all should be well at last.  Not so fast, grasshopper.  Yeah, the restore finished, but no files were brought back.  Only the folder (directory) names were restored.  So we notify the support desk, which in turn notifies the admins, which in turn notify the support desk, who reply with the following email on Dec. 17th:<br />
<br><br><blockquote><i>This is an update with the back up you have requested.<br />
Unfortunately, our administrators was not able to restored<br />
files in your web space.<br />
We sincerely apologized for the inconvenienced this has caused you.<br />
</i></blockquote><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Typos and all, bottom line it means their hardware failed, their backup failed, and you're out of luck, cupcake.  Fortunately I had taken a files backup and a database backup or we would have been totally 'toast'.  So I did a restore to the server overnight, and unpacked it today.  And now we're back up and running.<br />
<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Moral of the story?<br />
<ol><li>Perform backups regularly.  (read it again!)  Perform backups regularly!</li><li><strong>Don't trust 1and1 with your website.  Pick somebody else.</strong><sup><font color="#800000"> 14847</font></sup></li></ol>]]></description>
    <category>General</category>
    <comments>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1138</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:11:39 -0600</pubDate>
</item><item>
    <title>2009.12.05 - KeePass Update</title>
    <link>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1137</link>
    <description><![CDATA[&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;KeePass is a free, open source password manager that lets you keep all your passwords secure - and portable!  The classic version has just been updated to release 1.17.  If you're using KeePass, this is a recommended upgrade.  If you're not using a password manager, this one is highly recommended.  Stop using only one password on all your online accounts and gain the protection of unique passwords for all your secure access logins while having to remember just one password - the one to open your KeePass database.  Very mature, stable, and feature rich.  Get it at <a href="http://keepass.info/index.html" target=_blank>KeePass Password Safe</a>. <sup><font color="#800000"> 14839</font></sup>]]></description>
    <category>Software</category>
    <comments>xml-rss2.php?itemid=1137</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:25:05 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
    <!%blog(xmlrss2,10)
